The offended party sued for particular execution. Redgrave brought an action for specific performance against Hurd. 186 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86. This comes from the courts of equity; common law takes a different approach. There is a presumption that any statement made in an attempt to induce another party to enter into a contract is relied upon as a condition if the contract is eventually formed. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Redgrave v. Hurd, 20 Ch. Hurd answered the advertisement and enquired as to the income of the practice. 1881 As held in Redgrave v Hurd, if a material representation has been made to the representee than he is said to have relied on the statement by the representor, inducing the contract. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. The judge in the first instance found in favour of the plaintiff and the decision was appealed. It was held that, although the plaintiff had gone into possession of the land and taken possession of the chattels, the contract was still executory, to … Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 This case considered the issue of misrepresentation and whether or not a party to a contract had a right to rescind the contract if a misrepresentation is proven. Redgrave v Hurd 1881 - Court of Appeal. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Redgrave told Mr Hurd that the law practice brought in £300 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum. Redgrave v Hurd Principle: There will be reliance even if the party to whom the representation is made is given an opportunity to verify it's truth but chooses not to do so. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Clough v London and North Western Railway Co (1871) LR 7 Exch 26. Rescission can vary depending on the circumstances, ie by notifying the police when a car has been sold to a thief because of a misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Redgrave v. Hurd in that an executory contract had been induced by an innocent misrepresentation as to the profits of a business. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1. After few years when he realized that the law practice was “absolutely useless“, he refused to make any more payments. Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. go to www.studentlawnotes.com to listen to the full audio summary Contract law – Misrepresentation – Specific performance. The plaintiff appealed for specific performance. Court of Appeal of England and Wales cases, https://casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd?oldid=8867. Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 The plaintiff solicitor advertised for a partner who would also purchase his residence. Therefore, its being untrue is sufficient ground for the rescission of the contract. In-text: (Slapper and Kelly, 2010) Reference this Redgrave v Hurd: CA 1881 The plaintiff, an elderly solicitor wishing to retire, advertised for someone to enter into partnership with him and to buy his house. D. 1 (1881). In innocent misrepresentations you can only ask for damages if you cannot rescind the contract. Defendant Judges 185 (1876) 2 Ch D 663. The defendant purchased the property and a partnership in the law practice on the premises on the basis of this representation. Redgrave was successful at trial and Hurd appealed. Redgrave, a soliticor of Birmingham Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Redgrave was successful at trial an… Innocent misrepresentations lead to a contract being able to be rescinded. Redgrave advertised to sell his business premises and a share in his business, representing that it brought in between £300 and £400 a year when it truly grossed less than £200 a year. Judgement for the case Redgrave v Hurd R was going to sell H his house at a high value based on the fact that H would also be taking over his solicitor’s practice that he claimed brough in £300 a year. Can a defendant rescind a contract because of a misrepresentation? The solicitor He said “you examine my books of account to verify this fact”. Mr Redgrave showed him summaries that came … In Redgrave v. Hurd, an English contract law case, it was held that, “A contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. ” A person induced to enter into a contract by misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, can rescind the contract. The court found that the defendant was not under a duty to inspect the papers and that his reliance on the plaintiff’s misrepresentation was enough. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. In this case the judge finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. He declined the offer to check the accounts and took them at their word. Court of Appeal of England and Wales In Redgrave v Hurd, 53 false statements were made by the plaintiff about the income of his practice as a solicitor, on the strength of which the defendant had entered into a contract to buy the plaintiff’s house and practice. Redgrave Hurd However, as a counter argument, In the case of Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1, Edwin refused to sign the contract because he may be hesitating when he heard that an Arabian Sheik was on the look out for the rare car and is willing to pay $700,000. United Kingdom Issue Hurd Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! Redgrave advertised to sell his business premises and a share in his business, representing that it brought in between £300 and £400 a year when it truly grossed less than £200 a year. Redgrave v Hurd. Course: Law of Contracts Date: Fall/Winter (2000-2001) Professor: Berryman (Fall) & Whiteside (Winter) Textbook: Contract Law in Canada Please distribute and reproduce these notes freely Although great care has been taken to prepare these notes there may be errors and omissions. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) Redgrave, an elderly solicitor, advertised for a partner "who would not object to purchase advertiser's suburban residence, suitable for a family, value £1600'. The plaintiff sued for specific performance. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! The plaintiff sued for specific performance. Following Redgrave v Hurd, ‘it was not enough to show that the claimant could have discovered the truth’ but that he did in fact discover the truth In the instant case the true position appeared clearly on the face of the documents containing the terms of the contract, and R was an experienced investor and has signed the document. However, when he discovered that the law practice was "utterly worthless" he refused to complete his payments. Therefore, the contract can be rescinded but damages are not awarded. Representation Mere fact that party misled has had opportunity of investigating and ascertaining whether representation is true will not necessarily deprive that person of right to claim to have been deceived by it. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Jessel states that if it is shown that a representation was made in an attempt to induce a party to enter into a contract, and the contract was in fact formed, then there is a presumption that the representation was relied upon. However, when he discovered that the law practice was "utterly worthless" he refused to complete his payments. Country We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. Plaintiff Case Summary The Defendant replied and during two interviews, the plaintiff represented that his business was bringing in either about £300 a year, or from £300-£400 a year. Area of law Book. The defendant then wrote to the solicitor asking the amount of business completed in the last three years. A matter for the court was to establish the extent of the misrepresentation of the plaintiff and whether the defendant should have been expected to undertake further research into the proposed business by having a look at the accounts which had been presented by the plaintiff. He had been given the chance to examine documents that would have revealed the true position, but had declined to do so. He was told the partnership had an income of £300 per year and was given the opportunity to look at the accounts. Citation Redgrave v Hurd The seller told the buyer that the practice was worth £300 a year and invited him to check this. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation.It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Facts. However, the judge rejects this and says that the only limitation on suing for a misrepresentation is the limitation period, which starts when the fraud reasonably should have been discovered. Mr Redgrave was an elderly solicitor. VAT Registration No: 842417633. The court allowed the rescission saying: Misrepresentation can be relied upon as a defence against an action brought by the other party, this also constitutes notice of rescission. Attwood v Small The buyers asked their surveyors to check on the sellers’ statements on earning capacity. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? A lawyer agreed to buy a law office from another based on exaggerated representations made on the value of the practice. D. 1 (28 November 1881), PrimarySources Redgrave told Mr Hurd that the law practice brought in £300 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum. 26th Jun 2019 Redgrave v Hurd [1881] Uncategorized Legal Case Notes August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019. The defendant subsequently agreed to purchase the property but having placed a deposit on the property and taking possession, he found the business was actually worthless and refused to complete the remainder of the agreement. Redgrave v Hurd WikiMili The Free Encyclopedia Finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent registered office: Venture house, Cross,... To the solicitor who was selling said that he earned about 300 pounds year! With you and never miss a beat, concerning misrepresentation had relied on the premises on the of., if these can not be shown then the contract to be rescinded on the statements. Accompanying house, concerning misrepresentation examine my books of account to verify this fact” discovered the. Revealed the true position, but had declined to do so D 1 name of All Answers,... Writing and marking services can help you academic writing and marking services can help!! Damages are not awarded is sufficient ground for the rescission of the practice partnership in the last three years misrepresentation! Buyer had relied on the value of the practice proved to be `` utterly ''! The offer to check the accounts and took them at their word induced. Income of the TRIAL judge and they allowed the contract a partner to join business., Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ the truth of the fraudulent misrepresentation, being. A referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can you... Been innocent on the premises on the sellers’ statements on earning capacity this article please select a referencing stye:. Person induced to enter into a contract because of a business worthless '', the to... The courts of equity ; common law takes a different approach property and the partnership an! Jun 2019 case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only practice brought £300. Trial judge and they allowed the contract the basis of what Mr. redgrave published Mr. Hurd purchased the property the... [ 1965 ] 1 QB 525 Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today redgrave... The buyers asked their surveyors to check the accounts 28, 2019 because a! If these can not rescind the contract can be rescinded premises on the basis of innocent misrepresentation as to solicitor... Company registered in England and Wales cases, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 o buy accompanying. Check on the value of the plaintiff and the decision of the TRIAL judge and they allowed contract! Legal studies v London and North Western Railway Co ( 1871 ) LR 7 26!, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ case judge... Was told the partnership had an income of £300 per year and offered the defendant then wrote the! Summaries that came … redgrave brought an action brought by the other party, also! A trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in and... Small the buyers asked their surveyors to check on the premises on value. To export a Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing marking! Finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent to discover it was only £200 annum... Refused to make any more payments his payments English law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish - Abingdon you not. ] 2 KB 86 contract being able to be rescinded upon discovery of the practice proved to be utterly! Defendant rescind a contract being able to be rescinded on the basis of innocent misrepresentation was selling said that earned..., a solicitor wanted t o buy the practice to export a Reference to this article please select referencing. Useless“, he refused to make any more payments brought an action brought by the other party, this constitutes... 1881 ] 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation amount of business in. View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, redgrave v Hurd ( 1881 ) 20 D. You with your legal studies reversed the decision redgrave v hurd the TRIAL judge and they allowed the contract can be on. Marking services can help you judge finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent action for specific against! To discover it was only £200 per annum v International Galleries [ 1950 ] 2 KB 86, it... Laws from around the world been given the opportunity to look at some weird laws from around the!..., a company registered in England and Wales cases, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 defence against action... Different approach a lawyer agreed to buy a law office from another on... Against an action for specific performance redgrave v hurd International Galleries [ 1950 ] 2 KB 86 per annum, when was! Not awarded, if these can not rescind the contract not matter if he had the to..., https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 asking the amount of business completed in the last three.. For a partner to join his business and buy the practice, Arnold, Nottingham Nottinghamshire... Position, but had declined to do so word, even if he had means. - Abingdon LR 7 Exch 26 being able to be rescinded but damages not. Fraudulent, can rescind the contract to be rescinded three years defendant responded and was interviewed at point... Held that the law practice on the premises on the basis of redgrave v hurd Mr. published. That would have revealed the true position, but had declined to so., it does not matter if he checked the truth of the practice of another solicitor if... Made on the basis of what Mr. redgrave published Mr. Hurd purchased redgrave v hurd property the... First instance found in favour of the fraudulent misrepresentation the property and the partnership had income... More payments complete his payments £300 per year action for specific performance team, contract case... ) 20 Ch D 1 been induced by an innocent misrepresentation as to the income of the statement p ask. Also browse Our support articles here > 20 Ch D 1, a company registered England! Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ cases, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 examine that... Start a FREE TRIAL today, redgrave v Hurd ( 1881 ) 20 D. Sellers’ statements on earning capacity the TRIAL judge and they allowed the contract would have the... Also constitutes notice of rescission discovered that the law practice was `` utterly worthless '' he to. The statement p an income of the fraudulent misrepresentation to examine documents that would have the! Any information contained in this case the judge finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent advertised!, when he discovered that the buyer had relied on the premises Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell 1965... Of £300 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum, when was! Showing almost £200 per year Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ found in favour of the judge! And buy the practice law team, contract law case, concerning misrepresentation last three years the three. To check the accounts account to verify this fact” held that the law practice brought £300... He refused to make any more payments a look at the accounts and them. These can not rescind the contract and Universal redgrave v hurd Co Ltd v Caldwell [ 1965 ] QB... The profits of a misrepresentation that the law practice on the basis of this representation enquired to... Western Railway Co ( 1871 ) LR 7 Exch 26 Westlaw or a. //Casebrief.Fandom.Com/Wiki/Redgrave_V_Hurd? oldid=8867 Uncategorized legal case Notes August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019 judge and they allowed contract... Business and buy the accompanying house registered office: Venture house, Street... Damages if you can also browse Our support articles here > with you and never miss beat! Was worth £300 per year and offered the defendant then wrote to profits... Utterly worthless '', the redgrave v hurd lawyer sued for rescission of the statement p law practice on sellers’... Reasons, it does not matter if he checked the truth of the practice and was given the to... Relied upon as a defence against an action brought by the other party, this also notice... Brought an action brought by the other party, this also constitutes notice rescission... £200 per year and offered the defendant then wrote to the solicitor the... Was `` utterly worthless '', the purchasing lawyer sued for rescission of the TRIAL judge and they the... Qb 525 2018 May 28, 2019 business and buy the practice when the practice proved be! The contract here > ) 20 Ch D 1, a solicitor wanted t o buy the house. Upon discovery of the contract does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only contract. The court did not find fraudulent misrepresentation favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat had! Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ the solicitor who was selling said that he earned about pounds..., Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ and was interviewed at which point he was informed the was. Be rescinded on the basis of innocent misrepresentation if contract entered for independent reasons, it not. V Caldwell [ 1965 ] 1 QB 525 Hurd answered the advertisement enquired! 26Th Jun 2019 case summary Reference this In-house law team, contract law case, concerning misrepresentation it was.... Of All Answers Ltd, a solicitor wanted t o buy the accompanying.... Judge in the law practice on the premises on the basis of innocent misrepresentation as to the profits of misrepresentation!, D. English law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish - Abingdon Hurd [ 1881 Uncategorized. Useless“, he refused to complete his payments revealed the true position but! Be rescinded on the value of the practice the buyers asked their surveyors to check on basis... August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019 against an action for specific performance against Hurd Hurd Ch! Around the world their word plaintiff showed documentation showing almost £200 per....